• Users Online: 353
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 43-48

Does the timing of treatment with intraaortic balloon pump in cardiac surgery affect survival?


1 Cardiac Surgery and Transplantation Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Firoozgar Neurology, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran

Date of Submission31-Dec-2021
Date of Acceptance28-Jan-2022
Date of Web Publication27-Jul-2022

Correspondence Address:
Prof. Jamshid Bagheri
Cardiac Surgery and Transplantation Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 13185-1678, Tehran
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/rcm.rcm_71_21

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: The intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) is the most common mechanical assist device used as an adjunctive therapy for patients with low cardiac output among cardiac surgery. However, controversy still exists about the optimal time for IABP insertion. The study evaluated the association between timing of IABP insertion and outcome in cardiac surgical patients. Patients and Methods: Patients who underwent cardiac surgery between August 2007 and June 2014 were included. 273 of 3480 patients (7.84%) required perioperative IABP support. Of whom 21 (7.7%) received a preoperative IABP, 180 (65.9%) received an intraoperative IABP and 72 (26.4%) received a postoperative IABP. Predictors of early mortality were measured in stepwise multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results: The overall mortality rate for all patients requiring IABP was 29.3%. The incidence of mortality in patients who underwent pre-, intra- and postoperative IABP insertion was 19.0%, 22.8%, and 48.6%, respectively. The independent predictors of early mortality were age, cross clamp time, and postoperative IABP. However, either pre or intraoperative IABP insertion was not associated with increase in early mortality. Conclusions: IABP treatment in patients undergoing cardiac surgery was relatively safe accompanied by few complications. Timing of IABP insertion appears to be associated with survival as early insertion results are much more desirable compared to postoperative insertion.

Keywords: Cardiac surgery, early outcome, intraaortic balloon pump, mortality


How to cite this article:
Bagheri A, Banivaheb B, Heidari M, Bagheri J. Does the timing of treatment with intraaortic balloon pump in cardiac surgery affect survival?. Res Cardiovasc Med 2022;11:43-8

How to cite this URL:
Bagheri A, Banivaheb B, Heidari M, Bagheri J. Does the timing of treatment with intraaortic balloon pump in cardiac surgery affect survival?. Res Cardiovasc Med [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 12];11:43-8. Available from: https://www.rcvmonline.com/text.asp?2022/11/2/43/352501




  Introduction Top


The intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) is the most common mechanical assist device used as an adjunctive therapy for patients with low cardiac output during cardiac surgery. The balloon pump enhances myocardial oxygen supply by increasing aortic diastolic pressure and decreasing left ventricular afterload.[1] Todays, this assist device being most popular due to its easy deployment, cost effectiveness, and low rate of related complications.[2],[3],[4] Although the most benefit of IABP was seen in hemodynamically unstable patients because of myocardial ischemia, the overall in-hospital mortality remains high (ranging from 26% to 50%) in these patients receiving IABP.[5],[6],[7] However, underlying cardiac problems such as low cardiac output, as the main indication for IABP use, is itself a reason for death in cardiac surgical patients.[8]

Controversy still exists about the optimal time for IABP insertion. The incidence of mortality for preoperative insertion is about 20% while the intra- and postoperative insertion is associated with 30% and 40% mortalities, respectively.[9] Although these findings may suggest the preoperative prophylactic IABP use in high risk patients, there is still debate due to its complication such as limb ischemia and bleeding.[2]

The aim of this study was to present the timing of IABP use and its outcome during the perioperative period in cardiac surgical patients. We also determined the predictors of early mortality in patients undergoing IABP insertion among cardiac surgery.


  Patients and Methods Top


Patient selection

This retrospective study was conducted between August 2007 and June 2014. All consecutive patients who underwent cardiac surgery in our department were selected for the analysis using Shariati Hospital Cardiac Surgery Database. Of 3480 patients, 273 (7.84%) required perioperative IABP support. The surgical procedures were included isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), cardiac valve surgery and combined CABG with valve repair or replacement, left ventricular aneurysm repair, carotid intervention or posterior pericardiotomy.

Patients were classified depending on the timing of IABP insertion. All patients who received IABP before surgical skin incision were classified as preoperative group. Patients requiring IABP during any phase of operation constituted the intraoperative group. Finally, the postoperative group included patients receiving IABP in the intensive care unit. IABP placements were mostly made percutaneously through the femoral artery. The indications for IABP support were cardiogenic shock, fail revascularization or as a bridge to surgery for the preoperative group. Intraoperative and postoperative IABP insertions were mainly owing to difficulty of weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) despite maximal inotropic support and hemodynamic instability refractory to intravenous inotropic medications respectively.

The preoperative data such as gender, age, body surface area (BSA), diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and renal failure (elevated serum creatinine level more than 120 mmol/L) in addition to intraoperative findings including CPB time and aortic cross-clamp time were measured.

Clinical outcomes

The primary outcome was defined as mortality that occurred within 30 days of operation, whereas secondary outcomes were morbidities occurring during hospitalization. Significant postoperative morbidity was defined as need for reoperation for bleeding, leg infection, deep sternal infection, septicemia, vascular complications including acute limb ischemia and iliac or femoral dissection, pulmonary complications such as pleural effusion, pneumothorax or prolonged ventilation, cardiac arrest and other major morbidities. Moreover, patients who had suffered from stroke, those who had experienced a transient ischemic attack and patients who were in a coma made up the category of neurological complications. In addition to measuring supraventricular arrhythmia such as atrial flutter, fibrillation and paroxysmal atrial tachycardia, ventricular arrhythmia including ventricular tachycardia, fibrillation, and premature ventricular contraction were also evaluated postoperatively.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were done with the SPSS software version 16.0 program (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Quantitative and categorical variables were reported as mean ± standard deviation and percentages, respectively. T-test was performed on continuous variables, whereas Chi-square test (or Fisher's exact test, if required) was used to compare for categorical variables. P < 0.05 was considered statistical significance.

To identify the potential confounding effects of the risk factors on surgical outcomes, univariate analyses were performed. Then, all variables with a P < 0.2 were selected into stepwise backward selection and finally assessed by multivariable logistic regression.


  Results Top


Of 3480 cardiac surgery patients, 273 (107 females; mean age 58.1 ± 11.4) who required perioperative IABP support were enrolled in our study. The patients' baseline characteristics are presented in [Table 1]. Among these patients, 21 patients (7.7%) received IABP preoperatively, 180 patients (65.9%) intraoperatively, and 72 patients (26.4%) postoperatively.
Table 1: Patients` baseline characteristics

Click here to view


The majority of 273 patients underwent isolated CABG (63.7%) while valve procedure with and without CABG contained lower number of IABP patients (18.7% and 10.3% respectively). Two hundred and twenty-six patients (83.1%) underwent on-pump cardiac surgery and the incidence of CABG patients was 78.2%. The mean CPB and cross-clamp times were 130.5 ± 70.3 and 54.4 ± 49.7 min, respectively.

The incidence of postoperative complications in IABP patients is shown in [Table 2]. Out of 273 patients, 25 (9.2%) required reoperation owing to bleeding. Leg infections and acute limb ischemia occurred in 4 (1.5%) and 3 (1.1%) patients, respectively. However, there were no patients that experienced iliac or femoral dissection.
Table 2: Postoperative outcomes

Click here to view


The overall mortality rate for all patients requiring IABP was 29.3%. The incidence of mortality in patients who underwent pre, intra, and postoperative IABP insertion was 19.0%, 22.8% and 48.6%, respectively.

Univariate analyses of patients' baseline characteristics and operative data as predictors of mortality are presented in [Table 3] and [Table 4], respectively. Age, female, canadian cardiovascular society angina class III and IV, New York heart association class III and IV, postoperative IABP insertion, and prolonged CBP time and cross-clamp time increase the risk of mortality in IABP patients. However, increased BSA and LVEF less than 30% had protective effect on mortality rate in these patients. The comparison of basic characteristics based on patient's ejection fraction is presented in [Table 5]. The mean age, the incidence of female and postoperative IABP insertion in patients with left ventricle (LV) dysfunction (LVEF ≤ 30%) were significantly less than the patients with normal LV function. Moreover, other risk factors including DM, hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, renal failure, and hypertension were lower in patients with LV dysfunction [Table 5].
Table 3: Univariate analysis of patients` baseline characteristics for predictors of mortality

Click here to view
Table 4: Univariate analysis of patients` operative data for predictors of mortality

Click here to view
Table 5: Comparison of basic characteristics based on patient's ejection fraction

Click here to view


Multivariable logistic regression analyses identified that the independent predictors of early mortality were age, cross-clamp time, and postoperative IABP [Table 6]. However, either pre or intraoperative IABP insertion was not associated with increase in early mortality.
Table 6: Multivariate analysis for predictors of mortality

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The present study illustrated the early outcomes of 273 consecutive cardiac surgical patients who underwent IABP insertion at a single center. The results identified the postoperative IABP as one of the independent predictors of early mortality (P = 0.045); however, either pre or intraoperative IABP insertion was not associated with increase in early mortality.

IABP is the most common left ventricular assist device for the treatment of low cardiac output in cardiac surgical patients since its development in the 1960s.[10] By diastolic inflation and rapid systolic deflation, the balloon pump improves myocardial oxygen supply decreasing oxygen demand.[11]

The rate of the IABP insertion among patients undergoing cardiac surgery has increased recently as a result of increased high risk surgical population (such as older patients with poor LVEF and more complex cardiac pathologies).[12] Despite advances in surgical technique and improvements in perioperative care of these high risk patients, the perioperative IABP mortality is still high (up to 50%).[5],[6],[7]

The optimal time of IABP insertion is still controversial. On the other hand, it is hard to predict who will require IABP insertion or who can be managed without this device. By reviewing the literature, the incidence of mortality for preoperative IABP insertion is less than 20%. However, the overall hospital mortalities of intra and postoperative IABP insertions are much higher (about 30% and 40%, respectively).[9] Parissis et al. revealed that the mortality rates according to IABP timing were 18.2%, 33.3%, and 58.3% for pre, intra and postoperative insertion, respectively, by reviewing 136 patients undergoing cardiac surgery.[13] Furthermore, Ranucci et al. showed mortality rates with intra and postoperative IABP insertion as 41.5% and 64.45%, respectively.[14] Many previous studies revealed that preoperative IABP insertion was associated with reduction early mortality.[12],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19]

However, there is still concerns about the increase use of preoperative IABP owing to its life-threatening complications including major bleeding, limb ischemia, stroke, infections and vascular complications.[2] On the other hand, some recent studies showed that the preoperative IABP use did not represent an early postoperative survival benefit.[20],[21],[22] Moreover, a recent randomized controlled trial (n = 181) and a meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trial found that preoperative IABP use did not reduce the occurrence of 30-day mortality and adverse outcomes in high risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery.[23]

In accordance with literature, the overall hospital mortality of cardiac surgical patients who received IABP treatment was 29.3% in our study. Postoperative IABP insertion had highest mortality (48.6%) and was an independent predictor of early mortality. However, pre and intraoperative balloon pump use was associated with lower mortality (19.0% and 22.8%, respectively). Postoperative IABP indication was mainly due to hemodynamic instability resistant to intravenous inotropic medications that reflects patient's critical situation and explain this high mortality rate. A review article evaluated the perioperative IABP use in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and reported overall mortality ranging from 21% to 73%.[24] A retrospective study was conducted in Cleveland Clinic and the authors reported that the overall mortality for cardiac surgical patients with pre, intra, and postoperative IABP insertion was 12.6%, 17.5%, and 47.7%, respectively.[25] Kucuker et al. showed an overall mortality rate of 27.3% in 121 (5.4%) patients requiring IABP insertion among 2196 cardiac surgical patients. The mortality as per time of IABP insertion was reported as preoperative 33.3%, intraoperative 19.7%, and postoperative 41.7% in their study.[26]

The results of univariate analysis indicated lower rate of mortality in IABP patients with LV dysfunction. To explain it, we compared the basic characteristics based on patients EF and concluded that patients with LV dysfunction had a better profile than who had not LV dysfunction [Table 5]. However, LVEF was not associated with mortality in multivariate analysis.

Predictors of mortality in patients receiving IABP vary among different studies depending on the study population and on the methods used. Arafa et al. indicated that preoperative serum creatinine and myocardial infarction, LVEF, indication for operation and timing of IABP use were the independent predictors of mortality.[15] Age, history of cardiac surgery, and critical preoperative state were found as independent predictors of early mortality in another retrospective study.[27] Kucuker et al. found female gender, low LVEF, complex surgery, and postoperative IABP insertion as predictors for mortality.[26] In this study, age, aortic cross clamp time, and postoperative IABP was identified as independent predictors of early mortality. Although we previously reported intraoperative IABP as a predictor of mortality in isolated CABG patient,[28] both pre and intraoperative IABP was not significantly associated with increase in early mortality in the present study.

The retrospective nature of present study is one of the study limitations. Moreover, the small number of patients may have affected study power, although the number of patients undergoing IABP in the present study is greater in comparison with the previous study.[13],[16],[26],[27] However, we offset any confounding effects by applying a stepwise multivariate logistic regression model.


  Conclusions Top


IABP treatment in cardiac surgical patients was relatively safe accompanied by few complications. Timing of IABP insertion appears to be associated with survival as early insertion results are much more desirable in comparison with postoperative insertion.

Ethical clearance

This study was approved by the Tehran University of Medical Sciences ethical committee.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Scheidt S, Wilner G, Mueller H, Summers D, Lesch M, Wolff G, et al. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in cardiogenic shock. Report of a co-operative clinical trial. N Engl J Med 1973;288:979-84.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Meharwal ZS, Trehan N. Vascular complications of intra-aortic balloon insertion in patients undergoing coronary reavscularization: Analysis of 911 cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;21:741-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Ferguson JJ 3rd, Cohen M, Freedman RJ Jr., Stone GW, Miller MF, Joseph DL, et al. The current practice of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: Results from the Benchmark Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:1456-62.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Diez C, Silber RE, Wächner M, Stiller M, Hofmann HS. EuroSCORE directed intraaortic balloon pump placement in high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery – Retrospective analysis of 267 patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2008;7:389-95.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Kern MJ, Aguirre F, Bach R, Donohue T, Siegel R, Segal J. Augmentation of coronary blood flow by intra-aortic balloon pumping in patients after coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1993;87:500-11.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Sjauw KD, Engström AE, Henriques JP. Percutaneous mechanical cardiac assist in myocardial infarction. Where are we now, where are we going? Acute Card Care 2007;9:222-30.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
McGee EC Jr., Moazami N. Temporary mechanical circulatory support. In: Cohn L, editor. Cardiac Surgery in the Adult. 4th ed., Ch. 18. New York: MacGraw Hill; 2012. p. 417-37.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Christenson JT, Cohen M, Ferguson JJ 3rd, Freedman RJ, Miller MF, Ohman EM, et al. Trends in intraaortic balloon counterpulsation complications and outcomes in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:1086-90.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Creswell LL, Rosenbloom M, Cox JL, Ferguson TB Sr., Kouchoukos NT, Spray TL, et al. Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation: Patterns of usage and outcome in cardiac surgery patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54:11-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Kantrowitz A, Tjonneland S, Freed PS, Phillips SJ, Butner AN, Sherman JL Jr. Initial clinical experience with intraaortic balloon pumping in cardiogenic shock. JAMA 1968;203:113-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Baskett RJ, Ghali WA, Maitland A, Hirsch GM. The intraaortic balloon pump in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:1276-87.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Mannacio V, Di Tommaso L, De Amicis V, Stassano P, Musumeci F, Vosa C. Preoperative intraaortic balloon pump for off-pump coronary arterial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;93:804-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Parissis H, Leotsinidis M, Akbar MT, Apostolakis E, Dougenis D. The need for intra aortic balloon pump support following open heart surgery: Risk analysis and outcome. J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;5:20.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Ranucci M, Ballotta A, Castelvecchio S, De Vincentiis C, Biondi A, Parisi A, et al. Perioperative heart failure in coronary surgery and timing of intra-aortic balloon pump insertion. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010;54:878-84.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Arafa OE, Pedersen TH, Svennevig JL, Fosse E, Geiran OR. Intraaortic balloon pump in open heart operations: 10-year follow-up with risk analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:741-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Lavana JD, Fraser JF, Smith SE, Drake L, Tesar P, Mullany DV. Influence of timing of intraaortic balloon placement in cardiac surgical patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;140:80-5.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Santarpino G, Onorati F, Rubino AS, Abdalla K, Caroleo S, Santangelo E, et al. Preoperative intraaortic balloon pumping improves outcomes for high-risk patients in routine coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:481-8.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Gong Q, Xing J, Miao N, Zhao Y, Jia Z, Li J, et al. Beneficial effect of preventative intra-aortic balloon pumping in high-risk patients undergoing first-time coronary artery bypass grafting – A single center experience. Artif Organs 2009;33:587-92.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Escutia-Cuevas HH, Suárez-Cuenca JA, Espinoza-Rueda MA, Macedo-Calvillo L, Castro-Gutiérrez A, García-García JF, et al. Preoperative use of intra-aortic balloon pump support reduced 30-day mortality in a population with LVEF>35% and high surgical risk after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Cardiology 2020;145:267-74.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Yang F, Wang L, Hou D, Wang J, Wang X, Cui Y, et al. Preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump inserted in acute myocardial infarction patients without cardiogenic shock undergoing surgical coronary revascularization. Perfusion 2020;35:145-53.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Ali US, Lan NS, Gilfillan M, Ho K, Pavey W, Dwivedi G, et al. Preoperative intra-aortic balloon pumps in cardiac surgery: A propensity score analysis. Heart Lung Circ 2021;30:758-64.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Samanidis G, Georgiopoulos G, Bousounis S, Zoumpourlis P, Perreas K. Outcomes after intra-aortic balloon pump insertion in cardiac surgery patients. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2020;32:542-50.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Rocha Ferreira GS, de Almeida JP, Landoni G, Vincent JL, Fominskiy E, Gomes Galas FRB, et al. Effect of a perioperative intra-aortic balloon pump in high-risk cardiac surgery patients: A randomized clinical trial. Crit Care Med 2018;46:e742-50.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Baskett RJ, O'Connor GT, Hirsch GM, Ghali WA, Sabadosa KA, Morton JR, et al. The preoperative intraaortic balloon pump in coronary bypass surgery: A lack of evidence of effectiveness. Am Heart J 2005;150:1122-7.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Zaky SS, Hanna AH, Sakr Esa WA, Xu M, Lober C, Sessler DI, et al. An 11-year, single-institution analysis of intra-aortic balloon pump use in cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2009;23:479-83.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Kucuker A, Cetin L, Kucuker SA, Gokcimen M, Hidiroglu M, Kunt A, et al. Single-centre experience with perioperative use of intraaortic balloon pump in cardiac surgery. Heart Lung Circ 2014;23:475-81.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Saura E, Savola J, Gunn J. A 6-year single-center experience of intra-aortic balloon pump treatment – Retrospective analysis of 223 patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2015;29:1410-4.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Bagheri A, Masoumi A, Bagheri J. Early outcomes of coronary endarterectomy in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart Surg Forum 2016;19:E059-63.  Back to cited text no. 28
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Patients and Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed539    
    Printed8    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded68    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal